Gérard Houllier has fight to win over Aston Villa’s deflated fans

Club ask supporters to get behind the former Liverpool manager as successor to Martin O’Neill

The search has lasted 30 days but Aston Villa have finally got their man. The Villa Park board should be feeling relief and satisfaction after identifying a successor to Martin O’Neill, yet one of the club’s non-executive directors has been busy posting messages on supporters’ websites defending their decision to bring in Gérard Houllier and warning fans that their derogatory remarks might scare the Frenchman off before he has said bonjour.

It is a strange backdrop to the arrival of a new manager, whose appointment was officially confirmed tonight, and one that contrasts sharply with the open-arms welcome O’Neill was given when he took over four years ago when he was hailed as Villa’s saviour. General Charles C Krulak, right-hand man of the chairman Randy Lerner, had not joined Villa at that point, though had he been in post it is safe to assume he would not have been fighting fires over the recruitment of O’Neill as he has with Houllier.

Although it is difficult to gauge the overriding mood of Villa fans about the former Liverpool manager – message boards generally carry negative rather than positive comments – there does seem to be some apprehension about the Frenchman. It is almost as if the more sceptical Villa fans want to run a highlighter pen over the end of his six-year-reign at Anfield, when things started to unravel, and overlook everything else on his CV.

That seemed to be the point that Krulak, who has earned notoriety for his candid messages, was trying to make when he turned on the more critical Villa supporters.

“Take Mr H for example,” Krulak wrote. “Whatever anyone thinks of him, he deserves respect from the fans of this club. He has a fine record with multiple clubs and deserves better for the amount of effort he has put into his chosen career than to be ridiculed by AVFC.”

Houllier is unlikely to lose any sleep over the criticism, despite Krulak’s concerns that “any manager worth their salt is going to do some due diligence on the club and that would probably include reading up on the fans and the type of support they might receive”. The reality is that Houllier will have far more important things on his mind as he gets to grips with being a manager again for the first time since 2007 and returning to the Premier League after a six-year absence.

On the face of it, both timescales present potential problems, but those close to Houllier are confident he will readapt to frontline management in England with the minimum of fuss. “Football is his life,” said Rick Parry, the former Liverpool chief executive. “The fact he’s wanting to get back into the hurly-burly of football at this stage, when he could easily put his feet up, sums him up. I have the utmost respect for him and he will bring a wealth of knowledge with him to Villa.”

There is a sense that Houllier still remains upset at how he was treated at Anfield at the end. He recently claimed that when Rafael Benítez, his successor, left this summer, one of the Liverpool players sent him a text that said: “Boss, he hasn’t beaten you.” The problem for Houllier, however, is that he seems to be remembered more for the poor signings that tarnished the end of his Liverpool reign than the four trophies he collected along the way.

With Brad Friedel, Stephen Warnock and Emile Heskey all having played under Houllier at Liverpool, the Villa squad will be well briefed as to what to expect. Whether the 63-year-old brings in a former Liverpool player as his assistant or encourages Kevin MacDonald to step up to that position remains to be seen, but finding a senior role for the man who took over as caretaker when O’Neill resigned might be a wise move given the respect he commands from the players.

Getting off to a good start at Stoke on Monday, would be another step in the right direction in terms of winning over the doubters, many of whom seem to have ignored the unenviable position O’Neill placed Villa in when he quit five days before the season started. It is easy to pick faults in the decision to appoint Houllier, but much more difficult to come up with a better choice of manager from a limited field.

“There will always be some people against a manager because he is not the one they wanted, but I think the majority will give Gérard a go,” said Dave Woodhall, the editor of the Heroes and Villains fanzine and a supporters’ trust board member. “The people I have spoken to accept it was an horrendous time to be dropped in it, and that Houllier is the best available at the moment. I’m sure he’ll get the reception an Aston Villa manager deserves.”

Aston VillaStuart Jamesguardian.co.uk

Kevin MacDonald remains frontrunner to be Aston Villa’s next manager

• MacDonald will be given two more games to seal full-time job
• Villa inclined to treat 6-0 Newcastle defeat as a freak result

Kevin MacDonald remains the frontrunner to become the new Aston Villa manager, despite Sunday’s humiliating defeat at Newcastle United, and will be given the two matches this week, against Rapid Vienna and Everton, to prove that he is capable of doing the job on a permanent basis.

Although Villa were thrashed 6-0 at St James’ Park, Randy Lerner, the chairman, and Paul Faulkner, the chief executive, have treated the scoreline as a freak result. MacDonald impressed in his previous two games as caretaker manager, against West Ham United and Rapid Vienna, and Lerner and Faulkner believe it would be unfair to disregard those two performances and judge the 50-year-old purely on the basis of a woeful afternoon at Newcastle.

MacDonald will have the chance to turn things around against Rapid Vienna in the second leg of the Europa League play-off tie at Villa Park , and against Everton in the Premier League on Sunday, in what effectively amounts to a two-game trial. Two positive results and MacDonald, who stepped up from his duties as reserve-team manager when Martin O’Neill resigned five days before the start of the season, will almost certainly be offered the position.

Although Lerner and Faulkner have faith in MacDonald and admire his work behind the scenes at Villa over the last 15 years – he has played a key role in developing the youngsters who have broken into the first-team during that period and is regarded as an excellent coach – their willingness to give him the chance to prove himself as a manager is also a measure of the club’s lack of options because of the absence of any outstanding candidates elsewhere.

There has been no shortage of interest in the Villa post but the two managers who would have been strongly considered, Mark Hughes and Martin Jol, are already in work, at Fulham and Ajax respectively, and regarded as out of reach. One school of thought is that Villa might try to lure Jol if Ajax lose their Champions League play-off tie against Dynamo Kiev – they drew 1-1 in Ukraine in the first leg – but there is no indication that such a plan is in place at the moment.

MacDonald has yet to confirm whether he would be interested in succeeding O’Neill – he has hitherto expressed concerns about how the job would impact on his family life – although Villa are reasonably confident he would not turn the opportunity down. Lerner and Faulkner will, however, have a problem on their hands if results go against MacDonald, especially as the plan is to have a permanent manager in place by the end of next week, when there is an international break.

Aston VillaStuart Jamesguardian.co.uk

Martin O’Neill ‘allowed wages to spiral out of control at Aston Villa’

• Krulak: Manager believed he was bigger than the club
• Aston Villa’s annual wage bill has climbed to £71m

Randy Lerner, the Aston Villa chairman, has passed up the chance to shed any light on Martin O’Neill’s departure but his right‑hand man was more than happy to do the job for him today. General Charles C Krulak, a former US Marine Corps commandant who is a non-executive director at Villa Park, accused O’Neill of believing he was “bigger than the club” and of refusing to bring a spiralling wage bill under control.

Krulak’s comments, posted on a Villa supporters’ website, are sure to go down badly with O’Neill, who resigned as manager yesterday. The Northern Irishman felt unable to continue because of the financial constraints placed on him as Lerner sought to redress the balance after Villa’s annual wage bill climbed to £71m, accounting for 85% of the club’s turnover. Krulak claimed O’Neill was told that those figures were unsustainable but said that he would not tackle the problem.

“There is absolutely no question that Martin did a good deal for Villa and I have said, over and over, that I felt he did a fine job,” wrote Krulak. “At the same time, I can promise everyone that he knew and understood the long-range plans for the club and bought into them. He knew full well about the need to bring wages in line with revenue … the same as every Premiership club. He was absolutely supported by the owner during his time with the club … all one needs to do is look at the money spent. The reality is that the wage to revenue issue was not addressed and Martin apparently was unwilling to help address it. He quit.”

Yet it is Krulak’s comments about O’Neill’s personality that will provoke the most interest. The 68-year-old, who has regularly posted messages since Lerner took over in 2006, seemed to imply that O’Neill’s ego was out of control when he wrote: “As an aside, no one person is bigger than our club … not me, not Randy, not Paul, not Martin. What is interesting is that, apparently, only three of those named understand that fact.”

O’Neill came under further criticism from Curtis Davies, who rarely featured last season. “A lot of players have been frustrated by not having a fair crack of the whip and I’m one of them,” said the defender. “There is no guarantee whoever comes in is going to play you or not play you. But if you feel you have got a chance, then you are happy. As long as someone who comes in is fair, I am sure people will be happy. I felt I didn’t have a chance.”

Lerner had been expected to make a statement after flying back to England yesterday morning but the chairman has chosen not to comment at this stage. Whether that situation changes today remains to be seen, but the Villa owner is coming under growing pressure not only to talk about O’Neill’s exit and the search for a successor, but also to outline his wider plans, includinghow he intends to bring Champions League football to a club that looks like it has bitten off more than it can chew.

When Lerner spoke at the end of the season he said: “The ambition and appetite to compete for the top-four spot and qualify for the Champions League is as alive as it has ever been.” Yet the American was unable to offer a coherent strategy to support that goal. He suggested spending more money was not the answer as he discussed the merits of a “sell-to-buy” policy and talked about “other strengths”, including “continuity of your manager” and the ability to identify promising young talent. It felt like a weak case long before O’Neill departed.Lerner and the club’s chief executive, Paul Faulkner, who were at Villa’s training ground yesterday as Kevin MacDonald, the reserve-team manager, took his first session as caretaker manager, have drawn up a shortlist of candidates to replace O’Neill. Bob Bradley, the USA coach, and Sven‑Goran Eriksson have both signalled their interest in the job.

Any hopes of luring Martin Jol look to be doomed, with the Dutchman apparently happy at Ajax now that he has been backed in the transfer market.

Aston VillaMartin O’NeillStuart Jamesguardian.co.uk